The Political Science Association (PSA), Fazl Ali College, Mokokchung, organized its Introductory Program for PSA Freshers-cum-the 2nd PSA Debate on October 17 at the College Auditorium. The program began with an introductory note delivered by Mr. Kushemyimjong Chang, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science.
This was followed by the Debate Competition on the topic, “Inner Line Permit Protects Indigenous Identity and Preserves Peace in Nagaland.”
The event’s Guest, Judge, and critic was R Sunep Pongen, an alumnus of the college and former President of the Central Nagaland Students’ Association.
There were five participants on each side of the motion, delivering with confidence, presenting well-reasoned and engaging arguments.
R Sunep Pongen, in his reflections, congratulated all the speakers for their well-prepared presentations and provided constructive feedback. He elaborated on both the advantages and disadvantages of the Inner Line Permit (ILP).
He emphasized that the ILP serves as a safeguard for the Naga population, introduced during the British period to protect indigenous communities from extinction. He also made references to the 16-Point Agreement, suggesting that the ILP aligns with its spirit of preserving Naga identity. He emphasized that with the state’s small and declining population, the ILP acts as a necessary safeguard against demographic imbalance and cultural dilution. However, he also acknowledged the limitations and challenges posed by the system.
Download Nagaland Tribune app on Google Play
He cited instances where non-locals operate businesses in Nagaland under the names of locals, undermining the very purpose of the ILP. He also noted that the regulation often discourages industrial growth and investment, contributing to unemployment and economic stagnation. Furthermore, he remarked that tourism in Nagaland is affected, as many domestic travelers are deterred by the procedural requirements of obtaining an ILP.
He stressed the importance of striking a balance between protecting indigenous identities and creating space for economic progress and inclusivity, urging students to engage critically with such issues as future leaders and policymakers.
Representatives from B.A 1st, 3rd, and 5th Semesters of the Political Science Department shared their views and reflections on the debate.
The program concluded with declaration of results and wrapping-up remarks by Dr. E. Benrithung Patton, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science.
The Best Debater Awards were presented to Moameren A Longkumer (B.A 5th Semester) in first place, Witpong (B.A 3rd Semester) in second place, and Yimdangjungla Jamir (B.A 1st Semester) in third place.
